The recent Mexico Gen Z protests, sparked by public outrage over the death of a Michoacán mayor, drew thousands of demonstrators into Mexico City and led to reported violence and attacks on institutional buildings. Gaining momentum as they voiced opposition to the President of Mexico, the unrest unfolded in the nation’s capital, with confirmed incidents of violence occurring on or around 16 November 2025.
Protests Gaining Momentum after Mayor’s Assassination
The protests were directed against what participants described as systemic problems, including impunity surrounding violent crime, widespread corruption, and government inaction. The movement gained significant momentum following the assassination of Mayor Carlos Manzo Rodríguez of Uruapan, Michoacán, who was fatally shot on 1 November 2025, while attending a Day of the Dead festival. Mayor Manzo had been known for his active stance against drug-trafficking gangs in his town.
Protesters displayed banners with messages such as “We are all Carlos Manzo”. Many participants wore straw hats, which were emblematic of the late Mayor Manzo’s political movement. Organisers mobilised the demonstrations, which took place in more than 50 cities nationwide, via social media platforms.
Clashes and Injuries in Mexico City
The demonstration in Mexico City was described as having passed mostly peacefully until it reached the Zócalo, the city’s main square, where the National Palace is located. Protesters gathered in front of the National Palace, where the President works and resides.
A small group of protesters tore down some of the metal fences that had been placed to protect the building. Riot police guarding the compound responded to the breach by deploying tear gas and fire extinguishers to contain the crowds. Some individuals among the crowd threw projectiles, including rockets and stones, at the security forces. Police used their shields and also threw objects at the protesters.
The Secretariat of Citizen Security for Mexico City, Pablo Vázquez Camacho, reported that 120 people were injured during the march. The injured included 100 police officers, with 40 of those requiring hospitalisation for various injuries. Authorities confirmed that 20 protesters were injured and 20 people were arrested, with another 20 detained for administrative offenses.
Government Response and Political Context
President Claudia Sheinbaum had faced criticism of her security policy due to several high-profile murders. Ahead of the protests, President Sheinbaum questioned the demonstration’s motivations, stating during a regular press conference that the protest call was inorganic and paid for (social media bots). She further characterised it as a movement promoted from abroad against the government. Other government officials alleged that the protests were organised largely by right-leaning political opponents and promoted by automated accounts on social media. Some “Generation Z” social media activists reportedly withdrew their support for the event.
The President later condemned the violence, stating that disagreements should not be expressed with violence and urging peaceful methods for change. However, she affirmed the government’s willingness to listen while maintaining that public property damage could not be permitted.
Commentary
The Mexico Gen Z protests highlight a broader global pattern in which younger generations are reshaping the dynamics of political mobilisation. From France to Chile, Madagascar and Hong Kong, Gen Z-led movements have demonstrated a preference for decentralised organisation, rapid digital coordination and a willingness to confront institutions they perceive as unresponsive. Unlike earlier protest waves, which often relied on established political groups or long-standing civic organisations, these demonstrations tend to emerge organically through social media networks, drawing strength from viral symbols, shared outrage and fluid, leaderless structures.
In Mexico, this translated into a nationwide mobilisation that combined personal solidarity with Mayor Manzo and deeper frustrations over corruption and insecurity. Yet the same digital ecosystems that enable swift mass mobilisation also leave such movements vulnerable to accusations of manipulation, misinformation and ideological capture, as seen in the government’s claims about automated accounts and foreign influence. As Gen Z continues to assert itself politically, both in Mexico and globally, its protests reflect a generation unwilling to wait for gradual reform and increasingly prepared to challenge political authority directly. How governments respond to this new, digitally driven activism may shape the trajectory of civic unrest in the years ahead.
